Завантажити публікацію
The authors of the publication: AJDAČIĆ DEJAN 
Pages: 79–97.
UDC: 821.10.01/04.16
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4098-4660
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/slavicworld2023.22.079
Bibliographic description: Ajdačić, D. (2023) Verbal Markers of the Language of Enmity of the Slavic Peoples in a State of Military Confrontation. Slavic World, 23,
Received:
Recommended for publishing:

AJDAČIĆ DEJAN – a professor, a Ph.D., Institute of Сlassical Philology and Slavic Studies, Philological Faculty (Gdańsk, Poland).

According to the author, the differences within personal and group conflicts are considered as the starting point of the analysis of the specific signs of hate speech: on the one hand, these are the speech features of the aggressor who aims to hide his violence or justify it through threats or motivations based on the principles of justice, on the other hand, – the speech of a victim whose hostile attitude is the result of genuine suffering.

Analysis of sources. Our examples of hate speech have been drawn from the internet sources. Academic literature used in this text includes Victor Klemperer’s seminal book The Language of the Third Reich. Notes of a Philologist (1947), as well as culturally and ethnolinguistically oriented linguistic studies.

The purpose and task of the article is to analyze the language of hostility in the names and expressions that refer to the connection with Nazism, using the examples of the armed conflicts of the Slavs. In particular, the principles of condemning Nazism and Nazis after the Second World War are outlined, but the differences in the attitude to totalitarian ideology, respectively in the Eastern and Western blocs, according to which the communist parties of the times of the existence of socialism deliberately excluded communism from their ideologies, leading to mass crimes, are indicated. We have analyzed vocabulary related to Nazism that was used and is used in relation to the enemies in the military conflicts of the Slavs: Croats and Serbs in the mid-1990s, Ukrainians and Russians – from 2022. Examples of such vocabulary from Russian and Ukrainian, Serbian and Croatian languages are given in the study: Banderites, denazification, ruscism, Putler, Chetniks, Ustaše. Hatred caused by ideological postulates becomes part of political and military actions, manifests itself in various forms of hate speech. Linguistic methods are mentioned in the article, which, according to the author, can be useful in the application of interdisciplinary approaches to the consideration of this topic.

Keywords: Nazism, insults, hate speech, Nazis, rascists, Bandera, Chetniks, Ustaše, linguistic approaches.

References

  1. Bartmiński, Jerzy. Language – Image – World. Ethnolinguistic Studies. D. Ajdačić, ed.; translated by М. БЈЕЛЕТИЋ. Belgrade: Slovo Slavia, 2011 [іn Serbian].
  2. Otašević, Đorđe. New Words with the Surname ‘Putin’ Basically in the Serbian Language. Novorečje, 2023, no.8, pp. 76–104 [іn Serbian].
  3. Epstein, Mikhail. “Make Way, the Horde is Coming!” Philosopher on the Origins of Russian Aggressiveness [online] [viewed 25 January 2023]. Available from: https://www.severreal.org/a/filosof-ob-istokah-rossijskoj-agressivnosti/31748682.html [іn Russian].
  4. Epstein, Mikhail. Schizophrenic Fascism. Notes on the Nature of what is Happening [online] [viewed 25 January 2023]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/mikhail.epstein [іn Russian].
  5. Ajdačić, Dejan, Nepop-Ajdačić, Lidija. Środki językowe służące integracji grup awangardowych (naprzykładzie manifestów słowiańskich) [Linguistic Means for Integrating Avant-Garde Groups (Examplified by Slavic Manifestos)]. In: Żanna SLADKIEWICZ, Aleksandra KLIMKIEWICZ, K. WIELODEK, eds. Perswazja językowa w różnych dyskursach [Linguistic persuasion in various discourses]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Universita Gdańskiego [Gdańsk University Publishing House], 2021, vol.5, pp. 102–113 [іn Polish].
  6. BystroN, Jan S. Megalomania narodowa [National Megalomania]. Warsaw: Towarzystwo Wydawnicze «Rój» [„Roi” Publishing House], 1935 [іn Polish].
  7. CZERWIŃSKI, Marcin. «Faszyzm, antyfaszyzm: językowe praktyki w konstrukcji dyskursów o Niezależnym Państwie Chorwackim we współczesnej historiografii» [Fascism, Antifascism: Linguistic Practices in the Construction of Discourses about the Independent State of Croatia in Contemporary Historiography]. Prace Komisji Środkowoeuropejskiej [Works of the Central European Commission]. Kraków, 2006, 14, pp.103–126 [іn Polish].
  8. Klemperer, Victor. LTI Lingua Tertii Imperii: Notatnik filologa [The Language of the Third Reich: A Philologist’s Notebook], transl. and annotated by J.Zychowicz. Warsaw: Mlodziezowa Agencja Wydawnicza [Youth Publishing Agency], 1989 [online] [viewed 05 Fabruary 2023]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/KlempererVictorLTINotatnikFilologa/page/n2/mode/1up [іn Polish].
  9. Kristeva, Julia. Étrangers à nous-mêmes [Strangers to Ourselves]. Paris: Fayard, 1988 [іn French].
  10. Riabchuk, Mykola. Putin’s «Ukraine». ABrief History of a Disastrous Obsession. Warsaw East European Review, 2022, 12, pp. 33–58 [online] [viewed 05 Fabruary 2023]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/113250377/Putins_Ukraine_A_brief_Histoty_of_a_Disastrous_Obsession DOI: https://doi.org/10.61097/22992421/WEERXII/2022/33-57 [іn English].
  11. Szczepanik, Krzysztof, Jacek Wilamowski. «Ustaszeiseparatyzm chorwacki: przyczynekdobadań nad chorwackim ruchem nacjonalistycznym» [«Ustaše and Croatian Separatism: A Contribution to the Study of the Croatian Nationalist Movement»]. Przegląd Historyczny [Historical Review], 1983, 74/1, pp. 75–95 [іn Polish].

Translated from Serbian by Myroslava Karatsuba